login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Interpreting the force concept inventory: A reply to Hestenes and Halloun

• 59%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 54%: Interpreting force concept inventory scores: Normalized gain and SAT scores
• 53%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
• 52%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
• 49%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 46%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 45%: Force concept inventory
• 44%: The Force Concept Inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning
• 44%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 44%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 43%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
• 43%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
• 41%: Schematic concepts for schematic models of the real world: The Newtonian concept of force
• 41%: The calculus concept inventory: a psychometric analysis and implications for use
• 40%: Common Concerns About the Force Concept Inventory
• 40%: Examining evolving performance on the Force Concept Inventory using factor analysis
• 39%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
• 39%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
• 39%: Talking and learning physics: Predicting future grades from network measures and Force Concept Inventory pretest scores