login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to IOPSpark: Many students are slow to adopt the idea of magnetic poles

• 57%: IOPSpark: Many students are unable to accurately represent a magnetic field using field lines
• 41%: IOPSpark: Some students conflate magnetic and electrostatic effects
• 32%: Phenomenographic analysis and comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of electric and magnetic fields and the principle of superposition
• 29%: Examining the Evolution of Student Ideas About Quantum Tunneling
• 28%: IOPSpark: Misconceptions Collection
• 25%: Investigating Students' Ideas About X-rays While Developing Teaching Materials for a Medical Physics Course
• 23%: Do students use and understand free-body diagrams?
• 23%: Students’ metarepresentational competence with matrix notation and Dirac notation in quantum mechanics
• 22%: Algebra-Based Students & Vectors: Can ijk Coaching Improve Arrow Subtraction?
• 21%: The role of anomaly and of cognitive dissonance in restructuring students' concepts of force
• 21%: Student Ideas around Vector Decomposition in the Upper Division
• 20%: Students' conceptions of ideas in mechanics
• 20%: Evolution in students’ understanding of thermal physics with increasing complexity
• 20%: Student use of a material anchor for quantum wave functions
• 20%: Development of Novice Teachers' Views of Students Ideas as Sensible and Productive
• 20%: Productive resources in students’ ideas about energy: An alternative analysis of Watts’ original interview transcripts
• 19%: A Comparative Study of the Cognitive and Metacognitive Differences between Modeling and Non-Modeling High School Physics Students
• 19%: Student Understanding of Cross Product Direction and Use of Right-Hand Rules: An Exploration of Representation and Context-Dependence
• 19%: Physics students learning about abstract mathematical tools when engaging with “invisible” phenomena