login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory

• 64%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
• 61%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
• 56%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
• 56%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
• 54%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
• 54%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 54%: Gender & LEAP Pedagogy: What Does The Gender Force Concept Inventory Have To Say?
• 53%: Force concept inventory
• 53%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
• 51%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
• 51%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 51%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
• 51%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 50%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
• 50%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
• 50%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
• 49%: The Force Concept Inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning
• 49%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 49%: Common Concerns About the Force Concept Inventory