login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Instructor perspectives on iteration during upper-division optics lab activities

• 42%: Investigating student ownership of projects in an upper-division physics lab course
• 37%: Designing a lab course from the perspective of flow theory
• 35%: A Research-Based Approach to Assessing Student Learning Issues in Upper-Division Electricity & Magnetism
• 35%: Comparative analysis of letters and reports in an upper-division lab
• 34%: Student Perspectives on Using Clickers in Upper-division Physics Courses
• 33%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
• 33%: Using custom interactive video prelab activities in a large introductory lab course
• 33%: Upper-Division Activities That Foster “Thinking Like A Physicist”
• 31%: Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
• 31%: Multiple-Response Assessment for Upper-division Electrodynamics
• 31%: Assessment feedback: A tool to promote scientific practices in upper-division
• 30%: Faculty Perspectives about Instructor and Institutional Assessments of Teaching Effectiveness
• 29%: Transforming the advanced lab: Part I - Learning goals
• 28%: Research-Based Course Materials and Assessments for Upper-Division Electrodynamics (E&M II)
• 28%: Testing Tutorials in Upper-Division: An Example from Quantum Mechanics
• 28%: Revealing Differences Between Curricula Using the Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics Diagnostic
• 27%: But Does It Last? Sustaining a Research-Based Curriculum in Upper-Division Electricity & Magnetism
• 27%: Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics diagnostic: A conceptual assessment for the junior level
• 27%: Developing skills versus reinforcing concepts in physics labs: Insight from a survey of students’ beliefs about experimental physics