login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Common Concerns About the Force Concept Inventory

• 68%: Force concept inventory
• 67%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
• 67%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 67%: The Force Concept Inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning
• 67%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 65%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
• 65%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
• 65%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
• 65%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
• 64%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
• 64%: Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory
• 62%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
• 59%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
• 59%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 58%: Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory
• 58%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
• 55%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
• 55%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 54%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory