login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Talking and learning physics: Predicting future grades from network measures and Force Concept Inventory pretest scores

• 37%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 36%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 35%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
• 34%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 34%: Examining evolving performance on the Force Concept Inventory using factor analysis
• 34%: Sensitivity of Learning Gains on the Force Concept Inventory to Students’ Individual Epistemological Changes
• 33%: Talking to Learn Physics and Learning to Talk Physics
• 32%: Investigating Student Communities with Network Analysis of Interactions in a Physics Learning Center
• 29%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
• 29%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 29%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 28%: Using the Force Concept Inventory to monitor student learning and to plan teaching
• 28%: Non-traditional students' conceptual scores and network centrality in SCALE-UP classrooms
• 28%: What does the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation pretest measure?
• 27%: The Force Concept Inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning
• 27%: Gender & LEAP Pedagogy: What Does The Gender Force Concept Inventory Have To Say?
• 27%: What can normalized gain reveal about individual learning on the FCI?
• 27%: Investigating student communities with network analysis of interactions in a physics learning center
• 26%: Describing and Facilitating Productive Teaching Talk in a Faculty Online Learning Community