Materials Similar to Characterizing physics students’ ethical reasoning after a unit on the development of the atomic bomb

home » Detail Page » Similar Materials

Materials Similar to Characterizing physics students’ ethical reasoning after a unit on the development of the atomic bomb

37%: Characterizing differences in students' epistemologies between classical and quantum physics
37%: Students' reasoning about interdisciplinarity
36%: Pedagogical approaches, contextual variables, and the development of student self-efficacy in undergraduate physics courses
36%: Characterizing the Epistemological Development of Physics Majors
36%: Towards characterizing the relationship between students' interest in and their beliefs about physics
36%: Student Objections to and Understanding of Non-Cartesian Unit Vector Notation in Upper-Level E&M
35%: Integrating emotions into fine-grained accounts of students' reasoning
34%: Context of authority may affect students’ evaluations of measurement
34%: Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies-part I: student learning in physics
34%: Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development
34%: Examining students’ perceptions of innovation and entrepreneurship in physics
33%: Effects of Belief Bias on Student Reasoning from Data Tables
33%: Students as Co-creators: the Development of Student Learning Networks in PeerWise
32%: The combined effect of mathematics skills and formal operational reasoning on student performance in the general physics course
32%: Teaching about Inequity: Shifts in Student Views about Diversity in Physics
31%: Development of a concept inventory to assess students' understanding and reasoning difficulties about the properties and formation of stars
31%: Introductory physics students’ insights for improving physics culture
31%: Investigating a collaborative group exam as an instructional tool to address student reasoning difficulties that remain even after instruction
30%: Changing Scientific Reasoning and Conceptual Understanding in College Students