login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Gender & LEAP Pedagogy: What Does The Gender Force Concept Inventory Have To Say?

• 87%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
• 84%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
• 74%: Gender Differences in Both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance
• 69%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
• 68%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
• 68%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
• 68%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
• 68%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 68%: Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory
• 66%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 62%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
• 61%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
• 60%: Force concept inventory
• 60%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
• 59%: Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory
• 58%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
• 58%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 58%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 58%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics