login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Constructing a Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Quantum Physics from an Open-ended Tool

• 68%: Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
• 57%: Multiple-Response Assessment for Upper-division Electrodynamics
• 57%: Transforming Upper-Division Quantum Mechanics: Learning Goals and Assessment
• 57%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
• 52%: Coupled multiple-response versus free-response conceptual assessment: An example from upper-division physics
• 49%: Rubric Design For Separating The Roles Of Open-Ended Assessments
• 49%: Assessment feedback: A tool to promote scientific practices in upper-division
• 46%: Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics diagnostic: A conceptual assessment for the junior level
• 43%: Colorado Upper Division Electrostatics (CUE) Assessment
• 41%: Applying Rasch theory to evaluate the construct validity of brief electricity and magnetism assessment
• 40%: Quantum Mechanics Survey (QMS)
• 39%: Tapping into Juniors’ Understanding of E&M: The Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics (CUE) Diagnostic
• 39%: Revealing Differences Between Curricula Using the Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics Diagnostic
• 39%: Creating a coupled multiple response assessment for modeling in lab courses
• 39%: Quantum mechanics concept assessment: Development and validation study
• 39%: Test of understanding of vectors: A reliable multiple-choice vector concept test
• 38%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
• 38%: Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts
• 38%: Research-Based Course Materials and Assessments for Upper-Division Electrodynamics (E&M II)