Materials Similar to Exploring the contributions of self-efficacy and test anxiety to gender differences in assessments

home » Detail Page » Similar Materials

Materials Similar to Exploring the contributions of self-efficacy and test anxiety to gender differences in assessments

51%: Large gender differences in physics self-efficacy at equal performance levels: A warning sign?
50%: Inconsistent gender differences in self-efficacy and performance for engineering majors in physics and other disciplines: A cause for alarm?
49%: Gender differences in self-efficacy states in high school physics
41%: Self-Efficacy of First Year University Physics Students: Do Gender and Prior Formal Instruction in Physics Matter?
38%: Student behavior and test security in online conceptual assessment
35%: Replicating a self-affirmation intervention to address gender differences: Successes and challenges
35%: The Role of Students’ Gender and Anxiety in Physics Performance
35%: Investigating the role of prior preparation and self-efficacy on female and male students’ introductory physics course achievements
35%: Resource Letter RBAI-2: Research-based assessment instruments: Beyond physics topics
35%: Three critical issues that shape and complicate STEM self-efficacy intervention research: Reflections and analysis from an interdisciplinary research team
33%: Gender Differences in Physics 1: The Impact of a Self-Affirmation Intervention
33%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
33%: Exploring gender differences with different gain calculations in astronomy and biology
33%: Reducing the gender gap in students’ physics self-efficacy in a team- and project-based introductory physics class
33%: What happens between pre- and post-tests: Multiple measurements of student understanding during an introductory physics course
33%: Gender Differences in Student Responses to Physics Conceptual Questions Based on Question Context
33%: Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
33%: Improving STEM self-efficacy with a scalable classroom intervention targeting growth mindset and success attribution
33%: Methodological development of a new coding scheme for an established assessment on measurement uncertainty in laboratory courses