login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Assessment feedback: A tool to promote scientific practices in upper-division

• 58%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
• 48%: A Research-Based Approach to Assessing Student Learning Issues in Upper-Division Electricity & Magnetism
• 48%: Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
• 48%: Multiple-Response Assessment for Upper-division Electrodynamics
• 45%: Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics diagnostic: A conceptual assessment for the junior level
• 43%: Constructing a Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Quantum Physics from an Open-ended Tool
• 42%: Transforming Upper-Division Quantum Mechanics: Learning Goals and Assessment
• 42%: Research-Based Course Materials and Assessments for Upper-Division Electrodynamics (E&M II)
• 40%: Coupled multiple-response versus free-response conceptual assessment: An example from upper-division physics
• 40%: Developing coupled, multiple-response assessment items addressing scientific practices
• 39%: Colorado Upper Division Electrostatics (CUE) Assessment
• 39%: Revealing Differences Between Curricula Using the Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics Diagnostic
• 37%: Scientific abilities and their assessment
• 36%: Surveys fail to measure grasp of scientific practice
• 36%: Resource Letter RBAI-1: Research-Based Assessment Instruments in Physics and Astronomy
• 36%: Resource Letter RBAI-2: Research-based assessment instruments: Beyond physics topics
• 35%: Tapping into Juniors’ Understanding of E&M: The Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics (CUE) Diagnostic
• 35%: Making classroom assessment more accountable to scientific reasoning: A case for attending to mechanistic thinking
• 35%: A New Tool for Measuring Student Behavioral Engagement in Large University Classes