login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Using think-aloud interviews to characterize model-based reasoning in electronics for a laboratory course assessment

• 40%: Making Models of Measurement Tools: Examples from Think-Aloud Student Interviews
• 37%: How Physics Teachers Model Student Thinking and Plan Instructional Responses When Using Learning-Progression-Based Assessment Information
• 33%: Capturing modeling pathways using the Modeling Assessment for Physics Laboratory Experiments
• 29%: Using metacognitive prompts to explore student reasoning trajectories
• 27%: Using Conceptual Blending to model how we interpret computational models
• 26%: The role of modeling in troubleshooting: An example from electronics
• 26%: Creating a coupled multiple response assessment for modeling in lab courses
• 25%: Multilevel Rasch modeling of two-tier multiple choice test: A case study using Lawson’s classroom test of scientific reasoning
• 25%: Methodological development of a new coding scheme for an established assessment on measurement uncertainty in laboratory courses
• 25%: Reasoning with evidence while modeling: Successes at the middle school level
• 25%: The General Assessment of Problem Solving Processes and Metacognition in Physics Education
• 25%: Examining the relation of correct knowledge and misconceptions using the nominal response model
• 24%: Failure to Engage: Examining the Impact of Metacognitive Interventions on Persistent Intuitive Reasoning Approaches
• 24%: The Impacts of Modeling Physics in Upper-Level Courses: The Persistence of Males and Females
• 24%: The impact of social integration on student persistence in introductory Modeling Instruction courses
• 24%: Effect of an introductory quantum physics course using experiments with heralded photons on preuniversity students’ conceptions about quantum physics
• 24%: Quantitative critical thinking: Student activities using Bayesian updating
• 23%: Research-Based Course Materials and Assessments for Upper-Division Electrodynamics (E&M II)
• 23%: Examining inconsistencies in student reasoning approaches