login
-
create an account
-
help
AAPT ComPADRE
Events
Collaborate
About
Contact Us
home
»
Detail Page
» Similar Materials
Materials Similar to
Validation and analysis of the coupled multiple response Colorado upper-division electrostatics diagnostic
56%
:
Tapping into Juniors’ Understanding of E&M: The Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics (CUE) Diagnostic
52%
:
Revealing Differences Between Curricula Using the Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics Diagnostic
51%
:
Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics diagnostic: A conceptual assessment for the junior level
51%
:
Multiple-Response Assessment for Upper-division Electrodynamics
47%
:
Coupled multiple-response versus free-response conceptual assessment: An example from upper-division physics
43%
:
Colorado Upper Division Electrostatics (CUE) Assessment
42%
:
Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
42%
:
Creating a coupled multiple response assessment for modeling in lab courses
41%
:
Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
41%
:
Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis
39%
:
Analysis of Individual Test Of Astronomy STandards (TOAST) Item Responses
37%
:
Assessing learning outcomes in middle-division classical mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics and Math Methods Instrument
37%
:
Assessing student reasoning in upper-division electricity and magnetism at Oregon State University
37%
:
Analysis to Develop Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory
36%
:
Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
36%
:
Designing upper-division thermal physics assessment items informed by faculty perspectives of key content coverage
36%
:
Identifying a preinstruction to postinstruction factor model for the Force Concept Inventory within a multitrait item response theory framework
35%
:
Development and uses of upper-division conceptual assessments
35%
:
Preliminary development and validation of a diagnostic of critical thinking for introductory physics labs