Detail Page

Physical Review Physics Education Research
written by Marcos D. Caballero, Leanne Doughty, Anna Turnbull, Rachel E. Pepper, and Steven J. Pollock
Reliable and validated assessments of introductory physics have been instrumental in driving curricular and pedagogical reforms that lead to improved student learning. As part of an effort to systematically improve our sophomore-level classical mechanics and math methods course (CM 1) at CU Boulder, we have developed a tool to assess student learning of CM 1 concepts in the upper division. The Colorado Classical Mechanics and Math Methods Instrument (CCMI) builds on faculty consensus learning goals and systematic observations of student difficulties. The result is a 9-question open-ended post test that probes student learning in the first half of a two-semester classical mechanics and math methods sequence. In this paper, we describe the design and development of this instrument, its validation, and measurements made in classes at CU Boulder and elsewhere.
Physical Review Physics Education Research: Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 010118
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Classical Mechanics
- General
Education Foundations
- Assessment
= Conceptual Assessment
= Instruments
= Methods
- Student Characteristics
= Skills
- Upper Undergraduate
- Reference Material
= Research study
Intended Users Formats Ratings
- Researchers
- application/pdf
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Access Rights:
Free access
License:
This material is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.
Rights Holder:
Marcos D. Caballero, Leanne Doughty, Anna M. Turnbull, Rachel E. Pepper, and Steven J. Pollock
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010118
Keywords:
Classical Mechanics, Colorado Classical Mechanics and Math Methods Instrument, Math methods
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created June 4, 2017 by Lyle Barbato
Record Updated:
September 20, 2021 by Sam McKagan
Last Update
when Cataloged:
April 19, 2017
Other Collections:

ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
M. Caballero, L. Doughty, A. Turnbull, R. Pepper, and S. Pollock, , Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13 (1), 010118 (2017), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010118).
AJP/PRST-PER
M. Caballero, L. Doughty, A. Turnbull, R. Pepper, and S. Pollock, Assessing learning outcomes in middle-division classical mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics and Math Methods Instrument, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13 (1), 010118 (2017), <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010118>.
APA Format
Caballero, M., Doughty, L., Turnbull, A., Pepper, R., & Pollock, S. (2017, April 19). Assessing learning outcomes in middle-division classical mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics and Math Methods Instrument. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 13(1), 010118. Retrieved May 19, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010118
Chicago Format
Caballero, M, L. Doughty, A. Turnbull, R. Pepper, and S. Pollock. "Assessing learning outcomes in middle-division classical mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics and Math Methods Instrument." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, no. 1, (April 19, 2017): 010118, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010118 (accessed 19 May 2024).
MLA Format
Caballero, Marcos D., Leanne Doughty, Anna Turnbull, Rachel Pepper, and Steven Pollock. "Assessing learning outcomes in middle-division classical mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics and Math Methods Instrument." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13.1 (2017): 010118. 19 May 2024 <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010118>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "Marcos D. Caballero and Leanne Doughty and Anna Turnbull and Rachel Pepper and Steven Pollock", Title = {Assessing learning outcomes in middle-division classical mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics and Math Methods Instrument}, Journal = {Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.}, Volume = {13}, Number = {1}, Pages = {010118}, Month = {April}, Year = {2017} }
Refer Export Format

%A Marcos D. Caballero %A Leanne Doughty %A Anna Turnbull %A Rachel Pepper %A Steven Pollock %T Assessing learning outcomes in middle-division classical mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics and Math Methods Instrument %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 13 %N 1 %D April 19, 2017 %P 010118 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010118 %O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article %A Caballero, Marcos D. %A Doughty, Leanne %A Turnbull, Anna %A Pepper, Rachel %A Pollock, Steven %D April 19, 2017 %T Assessing learning outcomes in middle-division classical mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics and Math Methods Instrument %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 13 %N 1 %P 010118 %8 April 19, 2017 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010118


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials