Detail Page

American Journal of Physics
written by Robert J. Beichner
Video motion analysis software was used by introductory physics students in a variety of instructional settings. 368 high school and college students took part in a study where the effect of graduated variations in the use of a video analysis tool was examined. Post-instruction assessment of student ability to interpret kinematics graphs indicates that groups using the tool generally performed better than students taught via traditional instruction. The data further establishes that the greater the integration of video analysis into the kinematics curriculum, the larger the educational impact. An additional comparison showed that graph interpretation skills were significantly better when a few traditional labs were simply replaced with video analysis experiments. Hands-on involvement appeared to play a critical role. Limiting student experience with the video analysis technique to a single teacher-led demonstration resulted in no improvement in performance relative to traditional instruction. Offering more extensive demonstrations and carrying them out over an extended period of time proved somewhat effective. The greatest impact came from a combination of demonstrations with hands-on labs. The curricular modifications employed in the different classrooms and the methods used to evaluate them are discussed.
American Journal of Physics: Volume 64, Issue 10, Pages 1272-1277
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education Foundations
- Student Characteristics
= Ability
Education Practices
- Active Learning
- Pedagogy
- Technology
= Computers
General Physics
- Physics Education Research
- Lower Undergraduate
- High School
- Instructional Material
= Laboratory
- Reference Material
= Research study
Intended Users Formats Ratings
- Educators
- Researchers
- text/html
- application/pdf
- application/postscript
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Access Rights:
Available by subscription
Restriction:
© 1996 American Journal of Physics
Additional information is available.
Accession Number:
5412494
DOI:
10.1119/1.18390
Keywords:
CLASSICAL MECHANICS, EDUCATIONAL TOOLS, GRAPHS, KINEMATICS, LEARNING, VIDEO TECHNIQUES
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created June 13, 2005 by Lyle Barbato
Record Updated:
September 27, 2007 by Rebecca Barbato
Last Update
when Cataloged:
October 1, 1996
Other Collections:

ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
R. Beichner, , Am. J. Phys. 64 (10), 1272 (1996), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18390).
AJP/PRST-PER
R. Beichner, The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills, Am. J. Phys. 64 (10), 1272 (1996), <https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18390>.
APA Format
Beichner, R. (1996, October 1). The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills. Am. J. Phys., 64(10), 1272-1277. Retrieved April 27, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18390
Chicago Format
Beichner, Robert. "The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills." Am. J. Phys. 64, no. 10, (October 1, 1996): 1272-1277, https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18390 (accessed 27 April 2024).
MLA Format
Beichner, Robert. "The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills." Am. J. Phys. 64.10 (1996): 1272-1277. 27 Apr. 2024 <https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18390>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "Robert Beichner", Title = {The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills}, Journal = {Am. J. Phys.}, Volume = {64}, Number = {10}, Pages = {1272-1277}, Month = {October}, Year = {1996} }
Refer Export Format

%A Robert Beichner %T The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills %J Am. J. Phys. %V 64 %N 10 %D October 1, 1996 %P 1272-1277 %U https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18390 %O text/html

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article %A Beichner, Robert %D October 1, 1996 %T The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills %J Am. J. Phys. %V 64 %N 10 %P 1272-1277 %8 October 1, 1996 %M 5412494 %U https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18390


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials