Detail Page

Research in Science Education
written by Wheijen Chang and Beverley Bell
This paper argues that lecturers may provide insufficient challenge when teaching first year university physics courses, which may contribute to unsatisfactory learning outcomes. Comparisons in learning outcomes between a traditional teaching group and a constructivist orientated teaching group were investigated along with lecturers' and students' perceptions of those courses by interview and survey. Three main findings emerged from this study. The lecturers emphasised the students' poor physics background and adopted strategies to diminish the possible cognitive challenge in their teaching design. However, the students' concerns about the difficulty of the course seemed to be very minor. Finally, this study found that a teaching strategy of increasing the cognitive challenge for the students was likely to encourage an adoption of a comprehension learning approach, highlight the needs for learning university physics, and to promote cognitive engagement and learning commitment.
Research in Science Education: Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 81-96
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education Practices
- Active Learning
- Pedagogy
General Physics
- Physics Education Research
- Lower Undergraduate
- Reference Material
= Research study
Intended Users Formats Ratings
- Researchers
- Educators
- application/pdf
- non-digital
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Access Rights:
Available by subscription
Restriction:
© 2002 SpringerLink
DOI:
10.1023/A:1015054804515
ISSN Numbers:
0157-244X (Paper)
1573-1898 (Online)
Keywords:
Constructivism (Learning), Higher Education, Outcomes of Education, Physics, Science Education, Teacher Attitudes, Teaching Methods
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created June 13, 2005 by Lyle Barbato
Record Updated:
September 23, 2007 by Lyle Barbato
Last Update
when Cataloged:
March 1, 2002
Other Collections:

ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
W. Chang and B. Bell, , Res. Sci. Educ. 32 (1), 81 (2002), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015054804515).
AJP/PRST-PER
W. Chang and B. Bell, Making content easier or adding more challenge in year one university physics?, Res. Sci. Educ. 32 (1), 81 (2002), <https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015054804515>.
APA Format
Chang, W., & Bell, B. (2002, March 1). Making content easier or adding more challenge in year one university physics?. Res. Sci. Educ., 32(1), 81-96. Retrieved May 3, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015054804515
Chicago Format
Chang, Wheijen, and Beverley Bell. "Making content easier or adding more challenge in year one university physics?." Res. Sci. Educ. 32, no. 1, (March 1, 2002): 81-96, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015054804515 (accessed 3 May 2025).
MLA Format
Chang, Wheijen, and Beverley Bell. "Making content easier or adding more challenge in year one university physics?." Res. Sci. Educ. 32.1 (2002): 81-96. 3 May 2025 <https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015054804515>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "Wheijen Chang and Beverley Bell", Title = {Making content easier or adding more challenge in year one university physics?}, Journal = {Res. Sci. Educ.}, Volume = {32}, Number = {1}, Pages = {81-96}, Month = {March}, Year = {2002} }
Refer Export Format

%A Wheijen Chang %A Beverley Bell %T Making content easier or adding more challenge in year one university physics? %J Res. Sci. Educ. %V 32 %N 1 %D March 1, 2002 %P 81-96 %U https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015054804515 %O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article %A Chang, Wheijen %A Bell, Beverley %D March 1, 2002 %T Making content easier or adding more challenge in year one university physics? %J Res. Sci. Educ. %V 32 %N 1 %P 81-96 %8 March 1, 2002 %@ 0157-244X (Paper),1573-1898 (Online) %U https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015054804515


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials