login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses

• 39%: Skills-focused lab instruction improves critical thinking skills and experimentation views for all students
• 36%: Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs: concurrent validity
• 35%: Preliminary development and validation of a diagnostic of critical thinking for introductory physics labs
• 33%: Development of Data Processing Skills of Physics Students in Intermediate Laboratory Courses
• 32%: Development of a General Undergraduate Estimation Skills Survey (GUESS)
• 32%: Increased learning in a college physics course with timely use of short multimedia summaries
• 30%: Classification of open-ended responses to a research-based assessment using natural language processing
• 29%: Validated diagnostic test for introductory physics course placement
• 27%: Using think-aloud interviews to characterize model-based reasoning in electronics for a laboratory course assessment
• 27%: Reliability and Validity of an Introductory Physics Problem-Solving Grading Rubric
• 27%: Measuring Student Effort and Engagement in an Introductory Physics Course
• 27%: Kathy Schrock's Guide for Educators: Assessment & Rubric Information
• 27%: Tools for identifying courses that support development of expertlike physics attitudes
• 27%: Quantitative critical thinking: Student activities using Bayesian updating
• 27%: Development and validation of a conceptual survey instrument to evaluate senior high school students’ understanding of electrostatics
• 26%: Conceptual assessment tool for advanced undergraduate electrodynamics
• 26%: Development and validation of a pedagogy-specific problem-solving process rubric
• 26%: Effect of students’ investigative experiments on students’ recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study
• 26%: From a systematic investigation of faculty-produced Think-Pair-Share questions to frameworks for characterizing and developing fluency-inspiring activities