login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Analyzing Multiple-Choice-Multiple-Response Items Using Item Response Theory

• 64%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
• 61%: Identifying a preinstruction to postinstruction factor model for the Force Concept Inventory within a multitrait item response theory framework
• 58%: Linking and comparing short and full-length concept inventories of electricity and magnetism using item response theory
• 53%: Multidimensional item response theory and the Force Concept Inventory
• 53%: Multidimensional item response theory and the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment
• 52%: Exploring the CLASS with Item Response Theory
• 52%: Replicating analyses of item response curves using data from the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
• 51%: Comparing pre/post item response curves to identify changes in misconceptions
• 49%: Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve
• 46%: Testing the test: Item response curves and test quality
• 46%: Item response theory evaluation of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory national data set
• 46%: Multidimensional Item Response Theory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
• 45%: Assessing the assessment: Mutual information between response choices and factor scores
• 45%: Methods for utilizing Item response theory with Coupled, Multiple-Response assessments
• 44%: Criteria for collapsing rating scale responses: A case study of the CLASS
• 43%: Detecting the influence of item chaining on student responses to the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
• 43%: Analysis of Individual Test Of Astronomy STandards (TOAST) Item Responses
• 42%: Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
• 41%: Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions