login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Characterizing differences in students' epistemologies between classical and quantum physics

• 53%: Towards characterizing the relationship between students' interest in and their beliefs about physics
• 49%: Characterizing and monitoring student discomfort in upper-division quantum mechanics
• 45%: Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies-part I: student learning in physics
• 45%: The Influence of Student Understanding of Classical Physics When Learning Quantum Mechanics
• 45%: Refined characterization of student perspectives on quantum physics
• 44%: Impact of instructional approach on students' epistemologies about experimental physics
• 43%: Student Epistemologies in Project-based Learning Courses
• 42%: How social-media and web-accessible learning resources influence students’ experiences in a quantum physics course: A case study
• 41%: Physics Students' Epistemologies and Views about Knowing and Learning
• 41%: Identifying Differences in Diagnostic Skills between Physics Students: Developing a Rubric
• 40%: Using student-generated content to engage students in upper-division quantum mechanics
• 40%: Student interpretations of uncertainty in classical and quantum mechanics experiments
• 39%: Student reasoning about sources of experimental measurement uncertainty in quantum versus classical mechanics
• 39%: Student evaluation of more or better experimental data in classical and quantum mechanics
• 37%: A Comparative Study of the Cognitive and Metacognitive Differences between Modeling and Non-Modeling High School Physics Students
• 37%: Characterizing physics students’ ethical reasoning after a unit on the development of the atomic bomb
• 36%: Student Difficulties with Quantum Mechanics Formalism
• 36%: The construction of different classroom norms during Peer Instruction: Students perceive differences
• 36%: Desired Career Outcomes Among College Students: Differences by Gender and Intended Career Field