Materials Similar to Does active engagement curricula give long-lived conceptual understanding?

home » Detail Page » Similar Materials

Materials Similar to Does active engagement curricula give long-lived conceptual understanding?

50%: Introductory Physics Students Retention of Conceptual Understanding of Forces
50%: Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula
49%: Developing and validating a conceptual survey to assess introductory physics students' understanding of magnetism
47%: Development and validation of a conceptual survey instrument to evaluate students’ understanding of thermodynamics
46%: Conceptual Understanding of Resistive Electric Circuits Among First-year Engineering Students
44%: The Impact of the History of Physics on Student Attitude and Conceptual Understanding of Physics
44%: Analysis of Student Understanding of Statics Principles
43%: Visualizing patterns in CSEM responses to assess student conceptual understanding
42%: Modeling students’ conceptual understanding of force, velocity, and acceleration
40%: Longitudinal study of student conceptual understanding in electricity and magnetism
40%: Evaluation of Students’ Understanding of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts
39%: Longer term impacts of transformed courses on student conceptual understanding of E&M
38%: Changing Scientific Reasoning and Conceptual Understanding in College Students
38%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
37%: What happens between pre- and post-tests: Multiple measurements of student understanding during an introductory physics course
37%: The impact of problem-based learning on engineering students’ beliefs about physics and conceptual understanding of energy and momentum
36%: Effectiveness of Ninth-Grade Physics in Maine: Conceptual Understanding
35%: Development of a Rubric for Improved Understanding of IPLS Curricula
35%: Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation