Detail Page

Comparing Three Methods for Teaching Newton’s Second Law
written by Michael C. Wittmann and Mindi Kvaal Anderson
As a follow-up to a study comparing learning of Newton's Third Law when using three different forms of tutorial instruction, we have compared student learning of Newton's Second Law (NSL) when students use the Tutorials in Introductory Physics, Activity-Based Tutorials, or Open Source Tutorials. We split an algebra-based, life sciences physics course in 3 groups and measured students' pre- and post-instruction scores on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE). We look at only the NSL-related clusters of questions on the FMCE to compare students' performance and normalized gains. Students entering the course are not significantly different, and students using the Tutorials in Introductory Physics show the largest normalized gains in answering question on the FMCE correctly. These gains are significant in only one cluster of questions, the Force Sled cluster.
Physics Education Research Conference 2009
Part of the PER Conference series
Ann Arbor, Michigan: July 29-30, 2009
Volume 1179, Pages 301-304
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Classical Mechanics
- Newton's Second Law
Education Foundations
- Assessment
Education Practices
- Active Learning
= Inquiry Learning
- Lower Undergraduate
- Reference Material
= Research study
Intended Users Formats Ratings
- Researchers
- application/pdf
- non-digital
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Mirror:
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266742
Access Rights:
Free access and
Available for purchase
A preprint of the work is available. A hard copy of the PERC 2009 proceedings is also available.
Restriction:
© 2009 American Institute of Physics
DOI:
10.1063/1.3266742
PACSs:
01.40.Fk
01.40.G-
01.40.gb
Keywords:
Activity-Based Tutorials, Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE), Newton's Laws, Open Source Tutorials, PERC 2009, Tutorials in Introductory Physics
Record Cloner:
Metadata instance created October 14, 2009 by Alea Smith
Record Updated:
July 16, 2010 by Lyle Barbato
Last Update
when Cataloged:
November 11, 2009
Other Collections:

ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
M. Wittmann and M. Anderson, , presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2009, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2009, WWW Document, (https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=9512&DocID=1385).
AJP/PRST-PER
M. Wittmann and M. Anderson, Comparing Three Methods for Teaching Newton’s Second Law, presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2009, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2009, <https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=9512&DocID=1385>.
APA Format
Wittmann, M., & Anderson, M. (2009, July 29-30). Comparing Three Methods for Teaching Newton’s Second Law. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2009, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Retrieved April 24, 2024, from https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=9512&DocID=1385
Chicago Format
Wittmann, Michael, and Mindi Kvaal Anderson. "Comparing Three Methods for Teaching Newton’s Second Law." Paper presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2009, Ann Arbor, Michigan, July 29-30, 2009. https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=9512&DocID=1385 (accessed 24 April 2024).
MLA Format
Wittmann, Michael, and Mindi Kvaal Anderson. "Comparing Three Methods for Teaching Newton’s Second Law." Physics Education Research Conference 2009. Ann Arbor, Michigan: 2009. 301-304 Vol. 1179 of PER Conference. 24 Apr. 2024 <https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=9512&DocID=1385>.
BibTeX Export Format
@inproceedings{ Author = "Michael Wittmann and Mindi Kvaal Anderson", Title = {Comparing Three Methods for Teaching Newton’s Second Law}, BookTitle = {Physics Education Research Conference 2009}, Pages = {301-304}, Address = {Ann Arbor, Michigan}, Series = {PER Conference}, Volume = {1179}, Month = {July 29-30}, Year = {2009} }
Refer Export Format

%A Michael Wittmann %A Mindi Kvaal Anderson %T Comparing Three Methods for Teaching Newton's Second Law %S PER Conference %V 1179 %D July 29-30 2009 %P 301-304 %C Ann Arbor, Michigan %U https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=9512&DocID=1385 %O Physics Education Research Conference 2009 %O July 29-30 %O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Conference Proceedings %A Wittmann, Michael %A Anderson, Mindi Kvaal %D July 29-30 2009 %T Comparing Three Methods for Teaching Newton's Second Law %B Physics Education Research Conference 2009 %C Ann Arbor, Michigan %V 1179 %P 301-304 %S PER Conference %8 July 29-30 %U https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=9512&DocID=1385


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Comparing Three Methods for Teaching Newton’s Second Law:


Know of another related resource? Login to relate this resource to it.
Save to my folders

Contribute

Related Materials

Similar Materials