Detail Page

American Journal of Physics
written by Chance Hoellwarth and Matthew J. Moelter
We have developed a curriculum for introductory mechanics that emphasizes interactive engagement and conceptual understanding using the studio format. As previously reported, we have shown in three different quarters that the curriculum much improved the students' conceptual understanding compared to the traditional course without significantly affecting the scores on a traditional final exam. Here we report the results for the entire three-year period during which the course was taught, 34 sections of the course were taught with 11 different instructors to over 1200 students. In each term, these sections had common exams, syllabus, and schedule. Student experiences were very similar in terms of activities. Student performance was measured using the force and motion conceptual evaluation or the force concept inventory; the average pre/post normalized gain was 0.59. There was no significant correlation with any instructor characteristics, including teaching experience, knowledge of interactive-engagement methods, and attitudes. Because the instructor characteristics are not important, it is the structure of the course that promotes the learning gains.
American Journal of Physics: Volume 79, Issue 5, Pages 540-540
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education Foundations
- Assessment
= Conceptual Assessment
= Methods
Education Practices
- Active Learning
- Curriculum Development
- Learning Environment
- Lower Undergraduate
- Reference Material
= Research study
Intended Users Formats Ratings
- Researchers
- application/pdf
- non-digital
- text/html
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Access Rights:
Available by subscription and
Available for purchase
Restriction:
© 2011 American Association of Physics Teachers
DOI:
10.1119/1.3557069
PACSs:
01.40.Fk
01.40.Di
01.40.G-
01.40.gb
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created August 28, 2013 by Zachary Davis
Record Updated:
September 28, 2016 by Lyle Barbato
Last Update
when Cataloged:
May 1, 2011
Other Collections:

ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
C. Hoellwarth and M. Moelter, , Am. J. Phys. 79 (5), 540 (2011), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3557069).
AJP/PRST-PER
C. Hoellwarth and M. Moelter, The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics, Am. J. Phys. 79 (5), 540 (2011), <https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3557069>.
APA Format
Hoellwarth, C., & Moelter, M. (2011, May 1). The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics. Am. J. Phys., 79(5), 540-540. Retrieved April 26, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3557069
Chicago Format
Hoellwarth, Chance, and Matthew Moelter. "The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics." Am. J. Phys. 79, no. 5, (May 1, 2011): 540-540, https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3557069 (accessed 26 April 2024).
MLA Format
Hoellwarth, Chance, and Matthew Moelter. "The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics." Am. J. Phys. 79.5 (2011): 540-540. 26 Apr. 2024 <https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3557069>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "Chance Hoellwarth and Matthew Moelter", Title = {The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics}, Journal = {Am. J. Phys.}, Volume = {79}, Number = {5}, Pages = {540-540}, Month = {May}, Year = {2011} }
Refer Export Format

%A Chance Hoellwarth %A Matthew Moelter %T The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics %J Am. J. Phys. %V 79 %N 5 %D May 1, 2011 %P 540-540 %U https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3557069 %O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article %A Hoellwarth, Chance %A Moelter, Matthew %D May 1, 2011 %T The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics %J Am. J. Phys. %V 79 %N 5 %P 540-540 %8 May 1, 2011 %U https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3557069


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials