login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Extending modified module analysis to include correct responses: Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory

• 73%: Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis
• 64%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 61%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 60%: Deeper look at question categories, concepts, and context covered: Modified module analysis of quantum mechanics concept assessment
• 59%: Analysis to Develop Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory
• 58%: Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve
• 57%: Confirmatory factor analysis applied to the Force Concept Inventory
• 56%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
• 54%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 53%: An item-response curves analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 53%: Examining evolving performance on the Force Concept Inventory using factor analysis
• 53%: Detecting the influence of item chaining on student responses to the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
• 52%: Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race
• 51%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 50%: Balancing content of computerized adaptive testing for the Force Concept Inventory
• 49%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
• 49%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
• 48%: Evidence of measurement invariance across gender for the Force Concept Inventory
• 47%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests