login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom

• 56%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
• 51%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
• 50%: Force Concept Inventory: More than just conceptual understanding
• 46%: Analysis to Develop Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory
• 46%: Gender Differences in Both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance
• 46%: Evidence of measurement invariance across gender for the Force Concept Inventory
• 45%: Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race
• 44%: Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis
• 44%: Extending modified module analysis to include correct responses: Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 42%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 41%: Gender & LEAP Pedagogy: What Does The Gender Force Concept Inventory Have To Say?
• 41%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 41%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 38%: Balancing content of computerized adaptive testing for the Force Concept Inventory
• 38%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 38%: Analyzing the measurement error from false positives in the Force Concept Inventory
• 38%: Exploring the gender gap in the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism
• 37%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
• 37%: Confirmatory factor analysis applied to the Force Concept Inventory