login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Partitioning the gender gap in physics conceptual inventories: Force Concept Inventory, Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation, and Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism

• 73%: Item-level gender fairness in the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
• 69%: Exploring the gender gap in the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism
• 58%: Gender fairness within the Force Concept Inventory
• 56%: Assessing the longitudinal measurement invariance of the Force Concept Inventory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
• 54%: Detecting the influence of item chaining on student responses to the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
• 52%: Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom
• 50%: Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis
• 49%: Force Concept Inventory: More than just conceptual understanding
• 48%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
• 47%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
• 47%: Generating a growth-oriented partial credit grading model for the Force Concept Inventory
• 46%: Linking and comparing short and full-length concept inventories of electricity and magnetism using item response theory
• 46%: Applying module analysis to the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
• 45%: Analysis to Develop Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory
• 44%: Evidence of measurement invariance across gender for the Force Concept Inventory
• 44%: Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race
• 44%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
• 44%: Identifying a preinstruction to postinstruction factor model for the Force Concept Inventory within a multitrait item response theory framework
• 44%: Analyzing the measurement error from false positives in the Force Concept Inventory