Materials Similar to Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation

home » Detail Page » Similar Materials

Materials Similar to Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation

57%: What does the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation pretest measure?
50%: The Reliability of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
49%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
47%: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
45%: Validity and reliability of the force and motion conceptual evaluation
44%: Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula
42%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
40%: Evaluating students’ performance on the FCI at a minority serving institution
39%: Comparing students' performance on research-based conceptual assessments and traditional classroom assessments
38%: Modeling students’ conceptual understanding of force, velocity, and acceleration
38%: Conceptual Understanding of Resistive Electric Circuits Among First-year Engineering Students
36%: Applying a resources framework to analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
35%: Rotational and Rolling Motion Conceptual Survey
35%: Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory
35%: Teaching assistants' performance at identifying common introductory student difficulties revealed by the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism
35%: Gender Differences in Student Responses to Physics Conceptual Questions Based on Question Context
34%: Evaluation of the Translated Version of the FMCE
33%: Design and Evaluation of a Natural Language Tutor for Force and Motion
33%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory