login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Performance on In-Class vs. Online Administration of Concept Inventories

• 77%: In-class vs. Online Administration of Concept Inventories and Attitudinal Assessments
• 61%: Participation rates of in-class vs. online administration of low-stakes research-based assessments
• 51%: Do Concept Inventories Actually Measure Anything?
• 47%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 46%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 46%: Criteria for collapsing rating scale responses: A case study of the CLASS
• 45%: Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts
• 44%: Applying Rasch theory to evaluate the construct validity of brief electricity and magnetism assessment
• 43%: Comparing students' performance on research-based conceptual assessments and traditional classroom assessments
• 43%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 42%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 41%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
• 41%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
• 41%: Evaluating students’ performance on the FCI at a minority serving institution
• 41%: Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory
• 41%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
• 41%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
• 40%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
• 40%: Methodological development of a new coding scheme for an established assessment on measurement uncertainty in laboratory courses