Materials Similar to The Reliability of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation

home » Detail Page » Similar Materials

Materials Similar to The Reliability of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation

85%: Validity and reliability of the force and motion conceptual evaluation
83%: Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
77%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
76%: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
70%: What does the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation pretest measure?
69%: Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula
58%: Modeling students’ conceptual understanding of force, velocity, and acceleration
57%: Rotational and Rolling Motion Conceptual Survey
57%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
55%: Applying a resources framework to analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
50%: Design and Evaluation of a Natural Language Tutor for Force and Motion
49%: Evaluation of the Impact of the New Physics Curriculum on the Conceptual Profiles of Secondary Students
48%: Comparing students' performance on research-based conceptual assessments and traditional classroom assessments
48%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
48%: Introductory Physics Students Retention of Conceptual Understanding of Forces
47%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
46%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
46%: Conceptual Understanding of Resistive Electric Circuits Among First-year Engineering Students
46%: Development and Implementation of a Conceptual Survey in Thermodynamics