login - create an account - help

• Explore the Collections
• Events
• Partners
• People
• Collaborate
• Community Services
• Contact Us
• About ComPADRE

Materials Similar to Establishing reliability and validity: An ongoing process

• 56%: Applying Rasch theory to evaluate the construct validity of brief electricity and magnetism assessment
• 53%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 45%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
• 44%: Aspects of Validity in Quantitative Research
• 41%: Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions
• 40%: Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts
• 39%: Do Concept Inventories Actually Measure Anything?
• 38%: Investigating the Validity of the MPEX Survey
• 38%: Quantum Mechanics Survey (QMS)
• 38%: Comparing students' performance on research-based conceptual assessments and traditional classroom assessments
• 37%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 37%: Analysis of Student Understanding of Statics Principles
• 36%: Development of a Mechanics Reasoning Inventory
• 35%: Tapping into Juniors’ Understanding of E&M: The Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics (CUE) Diagnostic
• 34%: Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment
• 34%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
• 34%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
• 34%: Development of the Concise Data Processing Assessment
• 32%: FCI normalized gain, scientific reasoning ability, thinking in physics, and gender effects