Detail Page

Physics Education
written by Michael Prosser, Paul Walker, and Rosemary Millar
Recent research on student learning in higher education has highlighted the effect that students' perceptions of the nature of learning and understanding of their discipline has on their consequent understanding of the subject matter. This present project grew out of a programme aimed to help first-year students in physics develop their ideas on the nature of physics and how to study it. One of the issues to emerge from that project was the need to develop a more detailed understanding of students' perceptions, to be used both in further planning of the program and in its evaluation. This paper reports on the results of that study. It involved a before (340 students) and after (110) survey of first-year physics students at the University of Sydney. They were asked to complete an open-ended response survey, including questions on how they go about studying physics and what they thought the study of physics was about. A phenomenographic methodology was used to identify categories of description for each of the questions. The paper will describe the categories in some detail and the distribution of responses across the categories. It will also discuss a number of issues to emerge from the study and some implications for the practice of teaching physics.
Physics Education: Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 43-48
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education Foundations
- Assessment
General Physics
- Physics Education Research
- Lower Undergraduate
- Upper Undergraduate
- Reference Material
= Research study
Intended Users Formats Ratings
- Researchers
- Educators
- text/html
- application/pdf
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Access Rights:
Available by subscription
Restriction:
© 1996 IOP
Additional information is available.
Accession Number:
5181184
DOI:
10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/022
URL:
Link to Material
Keywords:
University-of-Sydney, education, first-year-physics-students, higher-education, learning, open-ended-response-survey, physics, physics, students'-perceptions, subject-matter, teaching, understanding
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created July 13, 2005 by Lyle Barbato
Record Updated:
November 17, 2005 by Vince Kuo
Last Update
when Cataloged:
January 1, 1996
Other Collections:

ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
M. Prosser, P. Walker, and R. Millar, , Phys. Educ. 31 (1), 43 (1996), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/022).
AJP/PRST-PER
M. Prosser, P. Walker, and R. Millar, Differences in students' perceptions of learning physics, Phys. Educ. 31 (1), 43 (1996), <https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/022>.
APA Format
Prosser, M., Walker, P., & Millar, R. (1996, January 1). Differences in students' perceptions of learning physics. Phys. Educ., 31(1), 43-48. Retrieved May 13, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/022
Chicago Format
Prosser, M, P. Walker, and R. Millar. "Differences in students' perceptions of learning physics." Phys. Educ. 31, no. 1, (January 1, 1996): 43-48, https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/022 (accessed 13 May 2024).
MLA Format
Prosser, Michael, Paul Walker, and Rosemary Millar. "Differences in students' perceptions of learning physics." Phys. Educ. 31.1 (1996): 43-48. 13 May 2024 <https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/022>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "Michael Prosser and Paul Walker and Rosemary Millar", Title = {Differences in students' perceptions of learning physics}, Journal = {Phys. Educ.}, Volume = {31}, Number = {1}, Pages = {43-48}, Month = {January}, Year = {1996} }
Refer Export Format

%A Michael Prosser %A Paul Walker %A Rosemary Millar %T Differences in students' perceptions of learning physics %J Phys. Educ. %V 31 %N 1 %D January 1, 1996 %P 43-48 %U https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/022 %O text/html

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article %A Prosser, Michael %A Walker, Paul %A Millar, Rosemary %D January 1, 1996 %T Differences in students' perceptions of learning physics %J Phys. Educ. %V 31 %N 1 %P 43-48 %8 January 1, 1996 %M 5181184 %U https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/022


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials