Detail Page

American Journal of Physics
written by Roseanne Di Stefano
During two academic years (1991–1992, 1992–1993), four new model curricula for the college-level, calculus-based introductory physics course were tested. A total of nine colleges and universities around the country participated in this test. This paper provides an overview of the evaluation process. The evaluation was independent--that is, it was not linked to the model developers or to the sites, nor was it directly implemented by the group that sponsored the project, the Introductory University Physics Project. At each site, we set out to study both 'model' and 'comparison' sections of the introductory physics course. There was a pre- and post-test, and some limited use of in-class questionnaires. Faculty members and roughly 10% of the students were asked to keep journals. Each test site was visited by an evaluator at least twice during each academic year. This paper provides some of the background necessary to assess the results of the IUPP evaluation. Some evaluation results from the 1991–1992 field tests are included in the following paper [R. Di Stefano, Am. J. Phys. 64 (1), 58–68 (1996)]. The main body of our results, including those focusing on the 1992–1993 trials, will be presented in later papers.
American Journal of Physics: Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 49-57
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education Practices
- Pedagogy
General Physics
- Physics Education Research
- Lower Undergraduate
- Reference Material
= Research study
Intended Users Formats Ratings
- Researchers
- Educators
- text/html
- application/pdf
- application/postscript
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Access Rights:
Available by subscription
Restriction:
© 1996 American Journal of Physics
Additional information is available.
DOI:
10.1119/1.18292
Keywords:
EDUCATION, EDUCATIONAL TOOLS, EVALUATION, LEARNING, PHYSICS, SURVEYS, TESTING, TEXTBOOKS
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created June 13, 2005 by Lyle Barbato
Record Updated:
October 26, 2005 by Vince Kuo
Last Update
when Cataloged:
January 1, 1996
Other Collections:

ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
R. Stefano, , Am. J. Phys. 64 (1), 49 (1996), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18292).
AJP/PRST-PER
R. Stefano, The IUPP evaluation: What we were trying to learn and how we were trying to learn it, Am. J. Phys. 64 (1), 49 (1996), <https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18292>.
APA Format
Stefano, R. (1996, January 1). The IUPP evaluation: What we were trying to learn and how we were trying to learn it. Am. J. Phys., 64(1), 49-57. Retrieved May 1, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18292
Chicago Format
Stefano, Roseanne Di. "The IUPP evaluation: What we were trying to learn and how we were trying to learn it." Am. J. Phys. 64, no. 1, (January 1, 1996): 49-57, https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18292 (accessed 1 May 2025).
MLA Format
Stefano, Roseanne Di. "The IUPP evaluation: What we were trying to learn and how we were trying to learn it." Am. J. Phys. 64.1 (1996): 49-57. 1 May 2025 <https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18292>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "Roseanne Di Stefano", Title = {The IUPP evaluation: What we were trying to learn and how we were trying to learn it}, Journal = {Am. J. Phys.}, Volume = {64}, Number = {1}, Pages = {49-57}, Month = {January}, Year = {1996} }
Refer Export Format

%A Roseanne Di Stefano %T The IUPP evaluation: What we were trying to learn and how we were trying to learn it %J Am. J. Phys. %V 64 %N 1 %D January 1, 1996 %P 49-57 %U https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18292 %O text/html

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article %A Stefano, Roseanne Di %D January 1, 1996 %T The IUPP evaluation: What we were trying to learn and how we were trying to learn it %J Am. J. Phys. %V 64 %N 1 %P 49-57 %8 January 1, 1996 %U https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18292


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials