![]()
written by
Daniel J. Everding and John Keller
We present the analysis of the planetarium usage survey (PLUS), a two-part, mixed-methods initial study investigating planetarium use in the U.S. by undergraduate learners. Seventy-seven planetariums situated on college or university campuses within the U.S. completed an online survey during the fall of 2018 with 11 of those participating in online or phone interviews during the summer of 2019. Planetarium representatives described how their facilities were being used, types of subject materials that were being taught, what content styles are used, and how often learners are attending lessons in the planetarium. Results suggest that undergraduate learners in a planetarium environment are primarily novice, non-STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) majoring students, learning principally astronomy content, receiving instruction from a live presenter approximately once per month within a given course, for the purpose of receiving visualization-based scaffolding. Audience response systems like iClickers do not appear to be in widespread use in collegiate planetariums, and presented subject matter shows greater variety in planetariums with digital projector capacity as opposed to those with only analog projectors. Refinements to PLUS and future research plans are described. Responses concerning audience populations (Fig. 2) propose that the primary learner group serviced by college and university planetariums is K-12 learners, not their own college learners.
Physical Review Physics Education Research: Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 020128
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!
![]() <a href="https://www.compadre.org/portal/items/detail.cfm?ID=15665">Everding, Daniel J., and John Keller. "Survey of the academic use of planetariums for undergraduate education." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, no. 2, (October 23, 2020): 020128.</a>
![]() D. Everding and J. Keller, , Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16 (2), 020128 (2020), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020128).
![]() D. Everding and J. Keller, Survey of the academic use of planetariums for undergraduate education, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16 (2), 020128 (2020), <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020128>.
![]() Everding, D., & Keller, J. (2020, October 23). Survey of the academic use of planetariums for undergraduate education. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 16(2), 020128. Retrieved May 4, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020128
![]() Everding, Daniel J., and John Keller. "Survey of the academic use of planetariums for undergraduate education." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, no. 2, (October 23, 2020): 020128, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020128 (accessed 4 May 2025).
![]() Everding, Daniel J., and John Keller. "Survey of the academic use of planetariums for undergraduate education." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16.2 (2020): 020128. 4 May 2025 <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020128>.
![]() @article{
Author = "Daniel J. Everding and John Keller",
Title = {Survey of the academic use of planetariums for undergraduate education},
Journal = {Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.},
Volume = {16},
Number = {2},
Pages = {020128},
Month = {October},
Year = {2020}
}
![]() %A Daniel J. Everding %A John Keller %T Survey of the academic use of planetariums for undergraduate education %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 16 %N 2 %D October 23, 2020 %P 020128 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020128 %O text/html ![]() %0 Journal Article %A Everding, Daniel J. %A Keller, John %D October 23, 2020 %T Survey of the academic use of planetariums for undergraduate education %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 16 %N 2 %P 020128 %8 October 23, 2020 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020128 Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.
Citation Source Information
The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual. The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References. The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation. The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ. |
ContributeSimilar Materials |