![]()
written by
Bashirah Ibrahim and Lin Ding
This study examines students' visual behaviors when they tackle two types of synthesis problems, sequential and simultaneous problems. Sequential synthesis tasks can be solved by applying pertinent concepts consecutively, whereas simultaneous synthesis tasks require concurrent application of multiple concepts. Twenty-two students from an introductory calculus-based physics course participated in the study. We used an eye-tracker to record the students' eye movements when they silently reflected on how to solve the problems and subsequently when they talked aloud their problem-solving strategies. We found that the students made more gaze transitions between text and diagram for the simultaneous problems than for the sequential ones. However, they spent more time looking at the diagram and making within-diagram eye transitions in the sequential tasks than in the simultaneous tasks. Further, most students invoked two concepts to solve the sequential tasks but only one for the simultaneous tasks. These findings indicate that the students made less effort to link text and diagram in solving sequential problems but frequently attempted to integrate information within each diagram. The pattern for the simultaneous problems appeared to be reversed. Our results suggest that different types of synthesis (i.e., sequential and simultaneous) may differentially influence the ways students handle tasks. As suggested by the eye-tracker data and confirmed by the participants' verbal explanations, students tend to divide the situation in sequential problems into subtasks but treat simultaneous problems as a single-step task.
Physical Review Physics Education Research: Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 010126
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!
![]() <a href="https://www.compadre.org/portal/items/detail.cfm?ID=15599">Ibrahim, Bashirah, and Lin Ding. "Sequential and simultaneous synthesis problem solving: A comparison of students’ gaze transitions." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, no. 1, (April 16, 2021): 010126.</a>
![]() B. Ibrahim and L. Ding, , Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17 (1), 010126 (2021), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010126).
![]() B. Ibrahim and L. Ding, Sequential and simultaneous synthesis problem solving: A comparison of students’ gaze transitions, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17 (1), 010126 (2021), <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010126>.
![]() Ibrahim, B., & Ding, L. (2021, April 16). Sequential and simultaneous synthesis problem solving: A comparison of students’ gaze transitions. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 17(1), 010126. Retrieved May 3, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010126
![]() Ibrahim, Bashirah, and Lin Ding. "Sequential and simultaneous synthesis problem solving: A comparison of students’ gaze transitions." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, no. 1, (April 16, 2021): 010126, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010126 (accessed 3 May 2025).
![]() Ibrahim, Bashirah, and Lin Ding. "Sequential and simultaneous synthesis problem solving: A comparison of students’ gaze transitions." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17.1 (2021): 010126. 3 May 2025 <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010126>.
![]() @article{
Author = "Bashirah Ibrahim and Lin Ding",
Title = {Sequential and simultaneous synthesis problem solving: A comparison of students’ gaze transitions},
Journal = {Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.},
Volume = {17},
Number = {1},
Pages = {010126},
Month = {April},
Year = {2021}
}
![]() %A Bashirah Ibrahim %A Lin Ding %T Sequential and simultaneous synthesis problem solving: A comparison of students' gaze transitions %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 17 %N 1 %D April 16, 2021 %P 010126 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010126 %O application/pdf ![]() %0 Journal Article %A Ibrahim, Bashirah %A Ding, Lin %D April 16, 2021 %T Sequential and simultaneous synthesis problem solving: A comparison of students' gaze transitions %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 17 %N 1 %P 010126 %8 April 16, 2021 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010126 Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.
Citation Source Information
The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual. The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References. The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation. The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ. Sequential and simultaneous synthesis problem solving: A comparison of students’ gaze transitions:
Covers the Same Topic As
Eye-movement study of high- and low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific argumentations with multiple representations
Both of these articles were featured in the April 16, 2021 issue of Physical Review-Physics Education Research within the larger heading "Eye Tracking Gets Complex". relation by Caroline HallKnow of another related resource? Login to relate this resource to it. |
ContributeRelated Materials
Covers the Same Topic As
Eye-movement study of high- and low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific… Similar Materials |