login - create an account - help
written by
Chance Hoellwarth, Matthew J. Moelter, and Randall D. Knight
We present data on student performance on conceptual understanding and on quantitative problem-solving ability in introductory mechanics in both studio and traditional classroom modes. The conceptual measures used were the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation. Quantitative problem-solving ability was measured with standard questions on the final exam. Our data compare three different quarters over the course of 2 years. In all three quarters, the normalized learning gain in conceptual understanding was significantly larger for students in the studio sections. At the same time, students in the studio sections performed the same or slightly worse on quantitative final exam problems.
American Journal of Physics: Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages 459-462
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!
Record Link
<a href="https://www.compadre.org/portal/items/detail.cfm?ID=14072">Hoellwarth, C, M. Moelter, and R. Knight. "A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms." Am. J. Phys. 73, no. 5, (May 5, 2005): 459-462.</a>
AIP Format
C. Hoellwarth, M. Moelter, and R. Knight, , Am. J. Phys. 73 (5), 459 (2005), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1862633).
AJP/PRST-PER
C. Hoellwarth, M. Moelter, and R. Knight, A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms, Am. J. Phys. 73 (5), 459 (2005), <https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1862633>.
APA Format
Hoellwarth, C., Moelter, M., & Knight, R. (2005, May 5). A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms. Am. J. Phys., 73(5), 459-462. Retrieved April 24, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1862633
Chicago Format
Hoellwarth, C, M. Moelter, and R. Knight. "A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms." Am. J. Phys. 73, no. 5, (May 5, 2005): 459-462, https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1862633 (accessed 24 April 2024).
MLA Format
Hoellwarth, Chance, Matthew Moelter, and Randall Knight. "A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms." Am. J. Phys. 73.5 (2005): 459-462. 24 Apr. 2024 <https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1862633>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{
Author = "Chance Hoellwarth and Matthew Moelter and Randall Knight",
Title = {A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms},
Journal = {Am. J. Phys.},
Volume = {73},
Number = {5},
Pages = {459-462},
Month = {May},
Year = {2005}
}
Refer Export Format
%A Chance Hoellwarth %A Matthew Moelter %A Randall Knight %T A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms %J Am. J. Phys. %V 73 %N 5 %D May 5, 2005 %P 459-462 %U https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1862633 %O application/pdf
EndNote Export Format
%0 Journal Article %A Hoellwarth, Chance %A Moelter, Matthew %A Knight, Randall %D May 5, 2005 %T A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms %J Am. J. Phys. %V 73 %N 5 %P 459-462 %8 May 5, 2005 %U https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1862633 Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.
Citation Source Information
The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual. The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References. The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation. The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ. |
ContributeSimilar Materials |
Save to my folders