written by Charles Baily, Laurens Bollen, Andrew Pattie, Paul van Kampen, and Mieke De Cock

Undergraduate physics students are known to have difficulties with understanding mathematical tools, and with applying their knowledge of mathematics to physical contexts.  Using survey statements based on student interviews and written responses to open-ended questions, we investigated the prevalence of correct and incorrect conceptions regarding the divergence and curl of vector fields, among both mathematics and physics students.  We compare and contrast pre-instruction responses from intermediate-level E&M students at KU Leuven and the University of St Andrews, with post-instruction responses from St Andrews students enrolled in a vector calculus course.  The differences between these student populations were primarily in areas having to do with physics-related concepts and graphical representations of vector fields.  Our comparison of pre- and post-instruction responses from E&M students shows that their understanding of the divergence and curl improved significantly in most areas, though not as much as would be desired.

• Download PERC15_Baily.pdf - 2314kb Adobe PDF Document

Last Modified December 16, 2015

This file is included in the full-text index.