Gender disparities in second-semester college physics: The incremental effects of a "smog of bias" Documents

Main Document

Gender disparities in second-semester college physics: The incremental effects of a “smog of bias” 

written by Lauren E. Kost-Smith, Steven J. Pollock, and Noah D. Finkelstein

Our previous research examined gender differences in introductory physics classes at the University of Colorado at Boulder. We found: (1) gender differences in several aspects of the course, including conceptual survey performance, (2) these differences persisted despite the use of interactive engagement techniques, and (3) the post-test gender differences could largely be attributed to differences in students' prior physics and math performance and their incoming attitudes and beliefs. In the current study, we continue to characterize gender differences in our physics courses by examining the second-semester, electricity and magnetism course. We analyze student retention from Physics 1 to 2, student performance, and students' attitudes and beliefs about physics, and find gender differences in all three areas. Specifically, females are less likely to stay in the physics major than males. Despite students performing about equally on the conceptual pretest, we find that females score about 6 percentage points lower than males on the conceptual post-test. In most semesters, females outperform males on homework and participation, and males outperform females on exams, resulting in course grades of males and females that are not significantly different. In terms of students' attitudes and beliefs, we find that both males and females shift toward less expertlike beliefs over the course of Physics 2. Shifts are statistically equal for all categories except for the Personal Interest category, where females have more negative shifts than males. A large fraction of the conceptual post-test gender gap (up to 60%) can be accounted for by differences in students' prior physics and math performance and their pre-Physics 2 attitudes and beliefs. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that it is an accumulation of small gender differences over time that may be responsible for the large differences that we observe in physics participation of males and females.

Released under a This article was published in Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 6, 020112, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020112 and is released under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Published September 3, 2010
Last Modified March 12, 2011

This file is included in the full-text index.
This file has previous versions.