Indicates a research-demonstrated benefit

Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment
Overview
A pedagogy for using clickers to accomplish highly interactive, student-centered science instruction, focusing on using provocative, meaty questions to engage students in extended whole-class discussion as a context and vehicle for learning.
| Type of Method | Instructional strategy | |
|---|---|---|
| Level | Designed for: Pretty much anything, especially (but not only) for larger class sizes. | |
| Setting |
Designed for:
Lecture - Large (30+ students) Can be adapted for: Lecture - Small (<30 students) |
|
| Coverage | Few topics with great depth, Many topics with less depth | |
| Topics | Mechanics, Electricity / Magnetism, Waves / Optics, Thermal / Statistical, Modern / Quantum, Mathematical, Astronomy, Other Science | |
| Instructor Effort | Medium | |
| Resource Needs | Clickers, Projector in class | |
| Skills |
Designed for:
Conceptual understanding of physics content Can be adapted for: Enjoyment of physics |
|
| Research Validation |
Based on research into:
how students learn Studied using: student interviews |
|
| Compatible Methods | Peer Instruction, PhET, UW Tutorials, JiTT, Ranking Tasks, ILDs, CGPS, Physlets, Context-Rich Problems, RealTime Physics, TIPERs, ABP Tutorials, SCALE-UP, OSP, SDI Labs, OST Tutorials, Thinking Problems, Workbook for Introductory Physics, LA Program, CAE TPS, Lecture-Tutorials, Astro Ranking Tasks, MBL, CPU, SCL, CU Modern, CU E&M, CU QM, QuILTs, Paradigms, Tools for Scientific Thinking, PI QM, M&I, Tutorials, Clickers, MOP | |
| Similar Methods | Peer Instruction, ILDs, Workbook for Introductory Physics, CAE TPS, PI QM, Clickers | |
| Developer(s) | Ian D. Beatty & William J. Gerace | |
| Intro Article | Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology |




