Materials Similar to Supporting student construction of alternative lines of reasoning

home » Detail Page » Similar Materials

Materials Similar to Supporting student construction of alternative lines of reasoning

47%: Supporting student quantitative skills across introductory STEM courses: faculty approaches and perceived needs
47%: Comparing undergraduate and graduate student reasoning on a conceptual entropy questionnaire
46%: Investigating students’ mental models and knowledge construction of microscopic friction. I. Implications for curriculum design and development
45%: Reading between the lines: lab reports help high school students develop abilities to identify and evaluate assumptions
45%: Exploring student facility with "goes like'' reasoning in introductory physics
43%: Comparing Student Ability to Reason with Multiple Variables for Graphed and Non-Graphed Information.
42%: Doing Science or Doing a Lab? Engaging Students with Scientific Reasoning during Physics Lab Experiments
42%: Using Eye Tracking to Differentiate Student Difficulties Reasoning with Data
41%: Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies-part I: student learning in physics
41%: Changing Scientific Reasoning and Conceptual Understanding in College Students
40%: Students' dynamic geometric reasoning about quantum spin-1/2 states
40%: Detecting Progression of Scientific Reasoning among University Science and Engineering Students
40%: Comparing student conceptions and construction of while loops in modeling motion
39%: The combined effect of mathematics skills and formal operational reasoning on student performance in the general physics course
39%: Effects of Belief Bias on Student Reasoning from Data Tables
39%: Characterizing physics students’ ethical reasoning after a unit on the development of the atomic bomb
38%: Examining inconsistencies in student reasoning approaches
38%: Can short duration visual cues influence students’ reasoning and eye movements in physics problems?
38%: Investigating student ability to follow and interact with reasoning chains