login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Analyzing false positives of four questions in the Force Concept Inventory

• 82%: Analyzing the measurement error from false positives in the Force Concept Inventory
• 57%: Optimizing the length of computerized adaptive testing for the Force Concept Inventory
• 55%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 54%: Assessing the longitudinal measurement invariance of the Force Concept Inventory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
• 52%: Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve
• 52%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 50%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 50%: Analysis to Develop Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory
• 49%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
• 49%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
• 47%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 47%: Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race
• 46%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 45%: Force concept inventory
• 45%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
• 44%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
• 44%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
• 44%: Deeper look at question categories, concepts, and context covered: Modified module analysis of quantum mechanics concept assessment
• 43%: Examining evolving performance on the Force Concept Inventory using factor analysis