login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Development and uses of upper-division conceptual assessments

• 66%: Coupled multiple-response versus free-response conceptual assessment: An example from upper-division physics
• 64%: Designing upper-division thermal physics assessment items informed by faculty perspectives of key content coverage
• 62%: Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics diagnostic: A conceptual assessment for the junior level
• 62%: Multiple-Response Assessment for Upper-division Electrodynamics
• 57%: Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
• 57%: Preliminary results for the development and deployment of Conceptual Learning Assessment Instruments Methodology Survey (CLAIMS)
• 55%: Conceptual assessment tool for advanced undergraduate electrodynamics
• 52%: Transforming Upper-Division Quantum Mechanics: Learning Goals and Assessment
• 52%: Assessing student reasoning in upper-division electricity and magnetism at Oregon State University
• 51%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
• 50%: Colorado Upper Division Electrostatics (CUE) Assessment
• 48%: Tapping into Juniors’ Understanding of E&M: The Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics (CUE) Diagnostic
• 46%: Development of the Concise Data Processing Assessment
• 46%: Constructing a Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Quantum Physics from an Open-ended Tool
• 46%: Quantum mechanics concept assessment: Development and validation study
• 46%: Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs: concurrent validity
• 46%: Applying module analysis to the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
• 45%: Development of a General Undergraduate Estimation Skills Survey (GUESS)
• 45%: Comparing exploratory factor models of the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism