J. Chini, A. Carmichael, E. Gire, N. Rebello, and S. Puntambekar, PERC 2010 Proceedings, 97-100.
Our previous work has shown that experimentation with virtual manipulatives supports students’ conceptual learning about simple machines differently than experimentation with…
C. Nakamura, S. Murphy, D. Zollman, M. Christel, and S. Stevens, PERC 2010 Proceedings, 237-240.
We present an initial analysis of data taken to test the technical functionality and student usability of an interactive synthetic tutoring system administered online. The system…
E. Price, C. De Leone, and N. Lasry, PERC 2010 Proceedings, 265-268.
Physics educators and researchers have recently begun to distinguish between pedagogical approaches and the educational technologies that are used to implement them. For instance,…
S. Pollock, S. Chasteen, M. Dubson, and K. Perkins, PERC 2010 Proceedings, 261-264.
Many upper-division courses at the University of Colorado now regularly use peer instruction in the form of clicker questions during lectures. Particular attention has been paid to…
H. Sadaghiani, PERC 2010 Proceedings, 285-288.
Physics laboratories are intended to provide students an opportunity to investigate physical phenomena by making observations, collecting and analyzing data, and presenting their…
N. Strand, J. Docktor, G. Gladding, J. Mestre, and B. Ross, PERC 2010 Proceedings, 313-316.
Within the context of traditional physics problem solving instruction, major concepts are mentioned but often marginalized by the focus on equation manipulation, resulting in…
