Search Results

You may use the options below to change your display:
Alter display preferences

The following options can help you tailor your search display:

results per page
Restricted to General Topic: Education Foundations
Restricted to Specific Topic: Sample Population
Close your folders

Refine your search


Narrow your results

By Subject:

By Resource Type:

By Context:
  • (5+)
  • (2+)
  • (12+)
  • (61+)
  • (23+)
  • (62+)
  • (22+)

By Collection:


|  Next >>   
Results #1-#10 of 100+
sort by: relevance | subject | date | title | author
  
Match Score:
100
Byline:
M. Dancy, C. Turpen, and C. Henderson
Post a comment | Relations
M. Dancy, C. Turpen, and C. Henderson, PERC 2010 Proceedings, 117-120.
As part of a larger ongoing study of physics faculty, we report on analysis of 15 interviews with Peer Instruction (PI) users. The analyses presented here address the following two…
  
Match Score:
100
Byline:
C. Henderson, M. Dancy, and M. Niewiadomska-Bugaj
Post a comment | Relations
C. Henderson, M. Dancy, and M. Niewiadomska-Bugaj, PERC 2010 Proceedings, 169-172.
During the Fall of 2008 a web survey, designed to collect information about pedagogical knowledge and practices, was completed by a representative sample of 722 physics faculty…
  
Match Score:
100
Byline:
C. Turpen, M. Dancy, and C. Henderson
Post a comment | Relations
C. Turpen, M. Dancy, and C. Henderson, PERC 2010 Proceedings, 325-328.
We previously reported on the results of a national web survey of physics faculty about their instructional practices in introductory physics. A subset of 72 survey respondents were…
  
Match Score:
100
Byline:
C. Henderson, K. Heller, P. Heller, V. Kuo, and E. Yerushalmi
Post a comment | Relations
C. Henderson, K. Heller, P. Heller, V. Kuo, and E. Yerushalmi, PERC 2002 Proceedings.
Based on an analysis of structured interviews with 6 research university physics faculty members, this paper presents our initial hypothesis of instructors' beliefs about how their…
Science and Education
  
Match Score:
100
Post a comment
R. Russ, J. Coffey, D. Hammer, and P. Hutchison, Sci. & Educ., 93 (5), 875-891 (2009).
When teachers or students assess the quality of ideas in science classes, they do so mostly based on textbook correctness ; ideas are good to the extent they align with or lead to…
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
  
Match Score:
100
Post a comment
C. Henderson, M. Dancy, and M. Niewiadomska-Bugaj, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., 8 (2), 020104 (2012).
During the fall of 2008 a web survey, designed to collect information about pedagogical knowledge and practices, was completed by a representative sample of 722 physics faculty…
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
  
Match Score:
100
Post a comment
F. Goldberg, E. Price, S. Robinson, D. Boyd-Harlow, and M. McKean, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., 8 (1), 010121 (2012).
We report on the adaptation of the small enrollment, lab and discussion based physical science course, Physical Science and Everyday Thinking (PSET), for a large-enrollment,…
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
  
Match Score:
100
Post a comment
K. Kreutzer and A. Boudreaux, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., 8 (1), 010120 (2012).
Gender differences in student learning in the introductory, calculus-based electricity and magnetism course were assessed by administering the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and…
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
  
Match Score:
100
Post a comment
C. Fazio, B. Di Paola, and I. Guastella, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., 8 (1), 010110 (2012).
In this paper we discuss a study on the approaches to modeling of students of the 4-year elementary school teacher program at the University of Palermo, Italy. The answers to a…
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
  
Match Score:
100
Post a comment
J. Thompson, W. Christensen, and M. Wittmann, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., 7 (1), 010108 (2011).
We describe courses designed to help future teachers reflect on and discuss both physics content and student knowledge thereof. We use three kinds of activities: reading and…
|  Next >>   
Results #1-#10 of 100+