Materials Similar to Comparing Student Use of Mathematical and Physical Vector Representations

home » Detail Page » Similar Materials

Materials Similar to Comparing Student Use of Mathematical and Physical Vector Representations

56%: Student difficulties with quantum states while translating state vectors in Dirac notation to wave functions in position and momentum representations
54%: Algebra-Based Students and Vector Representations: Arrow vs. ijk
53%: Algebra-Based Students & Vectors: Assessing Physical Understanding in Arrow vs ijk
47%: Student Understanding of Cross Product Direction and Use of Right-Hand Rules: An Exploration of Representation and Context-Dependence
46%: Students' difficulties with unit vectors and scalar multiplication of a vector
46%: Testing Students’ Understanding of Vector Concepts
46%: Student difficulties in translating between mathematical and graphical representations in introductory physics
45%: Comparing students' performance on research-based conceptual assessments and traditional classroom assessments
45%: Test of understanding of vectors: A reliable multiple-choice vector concept test
44%: Comparing Student Learning with Multiple Research-Based Conceptual Surveys: CSEM and BEMA
44%: Assessing students' ability to solve introductory physics problems using integrals in symbolic and graphical representations
43%: The Use of Multiple Representations and Visualizations in Student Learning of Introductory Physics: An Example from Work and Energy
43%: Students' Difficulties in Interpreting the Torque Vector in a Physical Situation
43%: Algebra-Based Students & Vectors: Can ijk Coaching Improve Arrow Subtraction?
42%: Student Epistemology About Mathematical Integration In A Physics Context: A Case Study
42%: Network Analysis of Students' Representation Use in Problem Solving
41%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
40%: Students’ Responses to Different Representations of a Vector Addition Question
40%: Comparing the development of students' conceptions of pulleys using physical and virtual manipulatives