login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Investigation of physics departments' assessment and change practices

• 60%: Research on university faculty members’ reasoning about how departments change
• 56%: Department-level change: Using social network analysis to map the hidden structure of academic departments
• 49%: Supporting first- and second-order departmental change with the Effective Practices for Physics Programs (EP3) Guide
• 48%: Assessment feedback: A tool to promote scientific practices in upper-division
• 46%: Instructors' Views on a Flexible Assessment Design
• 45%: Seeking missing pieces in science concept assessments: Reevaluating the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment through Rasch analysis
• 45%: Computational practices in introductory science courses
• 44%: A comparison study of pre/post-test and retrospective pre-test for measuring faculty attitude change
• 43%: The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types
• 41%: Revealing Effects Of Changes In Middle School Science Teachers’ Practices
• 41%: Developing coupled, multiple-response assessment items addressing scientific practices
• 41%: Developing the DELTA: Capturing Cultural Changes in Undergraduate Departments
• 40%: Test anxiety, self-efficacy, and gender: A quest for equitable assessment practices in physics
• 38%: Evaluating a model of research-based practices for teacher preparation in a physics department: Colorado PhysTEC
• 37%: Seeding Change: The Challenges of Transfer and Transformation of Educational Practice and Research in Physics (Part I)
• 37%: Seeding Change: The Challenges of Transfer and Transformation of Educational Practice and Research in Physics (Part II)
• 37%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
• 37%: Faculty Perspectives about Instructor and Institutional Assessments of Teaching Effectiveness
• 37%: What changes in conceptual change?