login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Analyzing the measurement error from false positives in the Force Concept Inventory

• 56%: Assessing the longitudinal measurement invariance of the Force Concept Inventory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
• 56%: Analysis to Develop Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory
• 52%: Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve
• 52%: Optimizing the length of computerized adaptive testing for the Force Concept Inventory
• 50%: Evidence of measurement invariance across gender for the Force Concept Inventory
• 50%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 46%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 46%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 45%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
• 44%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
• 44%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
• 43%: Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race
• 42%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 41%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
• 41%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 41%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
• 41%: Gender & LEAP Pedagogy: What Does The Gender Force Concept Inventory Have To Say?
• 41%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
• 40%: Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory