login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Analysis to Develop Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory

• 72%: Balancing content of computerized adaptive testing for the Force Concept Inventory
• 66%: Optimizing the length of computerized adaptive testing for the Force Concept Inventory
• 56%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 56%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
• 54%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 53%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
• 50%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 48%: Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race
• 47%: Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve
• 47%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
• 47%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 46%: Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory
• 46%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
• 45%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
• 45%: Examining evolving performance on the Force Concept Inventory using factor analysis
• 45%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
• 45%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
• 45%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
• 44%: Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test