login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Assessing the longitudinal measurement invariance of the Force Concept Inventory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism

• 43%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
• 43%: Evidence of measurement invariance across gender for the Force Concept Inventory
• 42%: Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve
• 42%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 38%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
• 37%: Multidimensional Item Response Theory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
• 37%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 36%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 36%: Replicating analyses of item response curves using data from the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
• 34%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 34%: Assessing students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism
• 32%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
• 32%: Examining evolving performance on the Force Concept Inventory using factor analysis
• 31%: Evaluation of Instruction Using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism in Mexico
• 31%: Talking and learning physics: Predicting future grades from network measures and Force Concept Inventory pretest scores
• 31%: Conceptual coherence of non-Newtonian worldviews in Force Concept Inventory data
• 31%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 31%: The calculus concept inventory: a psychometric analysis and implications for use
• 30%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?