login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve

• 44%: Replicating analyses of item response curves using data from the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
• 38%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
• 38%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
• 37%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
• 37%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 36%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 36%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 35%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
• 34%: Using the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory to Investigate College students' Pre-instructional Mental Models of Lunar Phases
• 34%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
• 34%: Examining evolving performance on the Force Concept Inventory using factor analysis
• 33%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
• 33%: Using the Force Concept Inventory to monitor student learning and to plan teaching
• 33%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 33%: Using psychometric tools as a window into students’ quantitative reasoning in introductory physics
• 32%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
• 32%: The Force Concept Inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning
• 32%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
• 32%: Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race