login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Implementing a mixed-methods approach to understand students’ self-efficacy: A pilot study

• 35%: Study of TA's ability to implement the Tutorials in Introductory Physics and student conceptual understanding
• 35%: Understanding the Nuance in Disciplinary Self-Efficacy
• 35%: Investigating the role of prior preparation and self-efficacy on female and male students’ introductory physics course achievements
• 35%: Pedagogical approaches, contextual variables, and the development of student self-efficacy in undergraduate physics courses
• 35%: Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering Students
• 34%: Criteria for collapsing rating scale responses: A case study of the CLASS
• 33%: Self-Efficacy of First Year University Physics Students: Do Gender and Prior Formal Instruction in Physics Matter?
• 33%: Exploring Student Learning Profiles in Algebra-based Studio Physics: A Person-Centered Approach
• 33%: A Multi-faceted Approach to Measuring Student Understanding
• 30%: Mapping university students’ epistemic framing of computational physics using network analysis
• 30%: Network centrality and student self-efficacy in an interactive introductory physics environment
• 30%: Reducing the gender gap in students’ physics self-efficacy in a team- and project-based introductory physics class
• 29%: Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies-part I: student learning in physics
• 29%: The experience sampling method: Investigating students' affective experience
• 29%: Student Objections to and Understanding of Non-Cartesian Unit Vector Notation in Upper-Level E&M
• 29%: How social-media and web-accessible learning resources influence students’ experiences in a quantum physics course: A case study
• 29%: Inconsistent gender differences in self-efficacy and performance for engineering majors in physics and other disciplines: A cause for alarm?
• 28%: Examination of Students’ Self-monitoring in Problem Solving
• 28%: What is the role of motivation in procedural and conceptual physics learning? An examination of self-efficacy and achievement goals