login - create an account - help

• AAPT ComPADRE
• Events
• Collaborate
• About
• Contact Us

Materials Similar to Assessing the assessment: Mutual information between response choices and factor scores

• 46%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
• 45%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
• 45%: Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
• 45%: Multiple-Response Assessment for Upper-division Electrodynamics
• 43%: Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions
• 42%: Criteria for collapsing rating scale responses: A case study of the CLASS
• 42%: Applying Rasch theory to evaluate the construct validity of brief electricity and magnetism assessment
• 40%: Exploratory factor analysis of the QMCA
• 38%: Creating a coupled multiple response assessment for modeling in lab courses
• 36%: Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs: concurrent validity
• 36%: Toward a valid instrument for measuring physics quantitative literacy
• 35%: Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts
• 35%: Development of the Concise Data Processing Assessment
• 35%: Coupled multiple-response versus free-response conceptual assessment: An example from upper-division physics
• 35%: What can normalized gain reveal about individual learning on the FCI?
• 35%: Methodological development of a new coding scheme for an established assessment on measurement uncertainty in laboratory courses
• 34%: Exploring the CLASS with Item Response Theory
• 34%: Do Concept Inventories Actually Measure Anything?
• 33%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory